Brutton v Alfred Savill, Curtis & Henson (1971)
Case Summary:
Title: Brutton v Alfred Savill, Curtis & Henson (1971)
Held: Agent is responsible for taking due checks before putting tenant in property. Agent was negligent in allowing prospective tenant to take possession without payment of a deposit of rent in advance.
In Brutton v Alfred Savill, Curtis & Henson,(1971), an office junior employed by the agents allowed a prospective tenant to take possession of premises without
To read more, a subscription is needed: Click here to subscribe


